ADSM-L

Re: ARCHIVALS

2000-12-18 09:10:13
Subject: Re: ARCHIVALS
From: Bob Bailey <rbailey AT EARLY DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:10:47 -0500
Yes.  AutoVault will manage the offsite vaulting of copy pools as well as
primary pools.  To vault your archivals, you would config AutoVault to
manage that particular primary pool.  All media in that primary pool will be
taken offsite.  All other primary pools containing your backup data would
remain onsite.  You would also configure it to manage all your copypools so
copies of all your backup data would be taken offsite.  AutoVault also
vaults full, incremental, and snapshot database backups as well as backup
set media.

Bob

>Forum:     ADSM - ADSTAR Distributed Storage Management
> Date:        Dec 15, 09:28
> From:       Selva, Perpetua <perpetua.selva AT RBCDS DOT COM>
>
>Does AutoVault has the capability to take into consideration that the tapes
>need to be offsite regardless of the fact that it has a copy pool or not?
>Basically trying to ask if it covers both scnarios?
>
>Thanks
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bob Bailey [mailto:rbailey AT EARLY DOT COM]
>Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 8:51 AM
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>Subject: Re: ARCHIVALS
>
>
>The only way to send them offsite is to copy them to a copypool.  DRM will
>not send your archive tapes offsite.  We use AutoVault (www.coderelief.com)
>instead of DRM for offsite vaulting.  It can vault your clients archive
>tapes offsite without the need to copy them to a copypool.  It can also
>vault backupsets if they decide to go that route.
>
>Bob Bailey
>Network Administrator
>Lafayette College
>
>ARCHIVALS
>
> Forum:     ADSM - ADSTAR Distributed Storage Management
> Date:        Dec 14, 11:58
> From:       Selva, Perpetua <perpetua.selva AT RBCDS DOT COM>
>
>Can you send archivals offsite and how would that would tie in with DRM?
>Clients do not want copies onsite..
>
>Please Advise
>
>Please let me know
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>