Richard - from what I read about that, it seems that it would have no
effect on this.  This has nothing to do with the "same" volume usages by
two processes, but just choosing to have one process run before
another.

Hopefully someone from Tivoly/IBM will see and respond.

-Tom
>>> rbs AT BU DOT EDU 09/20/00 07:33AM >>>
>>> rbs AT BU DOT EDU 09/20/00 07:33AM >>>
>Is there any way to modify the priority of CHECKIN to be higher than
>CHECKOUT in the background process queue?

Tom - I'm not aware of a means yet available in the product to allow
for
      selective prioritization.  One thing you might try is to use the
NOPREEMPT server option and see if that has the desired effect.
If you do, could you let us know whether it does?

  thanks,  Richard Sims, BU