How about the failed and successful fields?  I am
seeing many skipped files on my NT servers but failed
= 0 and successful = yes for these.

I will also open a record with ibm/tivoli.


--- Bill Colwell <bcolwell AT DRAPER DOT COM> wrote:
> I am on 3.7.3.6 for os/390 and it is not fixed.
> I am on 3.7.3.6 for os/390 and it is not fixed.
> Examined and
> affected are the same.  I opened a pmr about this
> and sent doc
> but I haven't heard anything from ibm in over a
> month.
>
>
> --
> --------------------------
> Bill Colwell
> C. S. Draper Lab
> Cambridge, Ma.
> bcolwell AT draper DOT com
> --------------------------
>
>
> In
> <20000914200210.12894.qmail AT web617.mail.yahoo DOT com>,
> on 09/14/00
>    at 04:50 PM, "E. J." <sysback AT YAHOO DOT COM> said:
>
> >    For Client Monitoring and Reporting, I am going
> to
> >generate reports against the system summary table.
> ie:
> >select * from summary
> >    However, when I compare the table data to the
> >backup statistics in the activity log, the
> examined,
> >affected, failed, and successful fields do not
> match.
> >I am currently at 3.7.0.0 and understand that there
> is
> >a PTF at 3.7.2.0 that addresses the summary table.
> >Can anyone who is currently at 3.7.2.0 or higher
> >verify that this is fixed?  I wasn't planning on
> >upgrading my system until Nov-Dec, but if this is
> >fixed I will do it now.
>
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from
> anywhere!
> >http://mail.yahoo.com/


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/