ADSM-L

Re: Preferred server? ADSM on NT vs ADSM on AIX

2000-08-04 15:30:57
Subject: Re: Preferred server? ADSM on NT vs ADSM on AIX
From: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 15:30:57 -0400
Hal - This religious issue was painfully visited a couple of months ago:
      see the List archives.
A compelling argument for AIX is that NT's I/O system (at least through
NT4) has been a rather poor performer because of layering in the I/O
system.  An article in the March 2000 issue of Computer Technology Review
cites a real-world example of getting 12MB/sec throughput on a PC running
Linux, but only 3MB/sec when it was running NT, for example.  I haven't
seen numbers for Windows 2000, but would not expect dramatic improvements.
    Richard Sims, BU
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>