ADSM-L

Re: cannot open tcp/ip driver

2000-07-19 16:40:32
Subject: Re: cannot open tcp/ip driver
From: Boe Franklin <boe.franklin AT DB DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 16:40:32 -0400
Thanks, That fixed it.
Also support is sending ptfs UQ43135,6,7,8,9&UQ43140.
Also suggested moving to v3.7.3.6 (which we will do once
we get smpe to support the syntax)
Again, thanks....
Thanks,
Boe Franklin
410-308-6796
Technical Services, Atrium
Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rejean Larivee [SMTP:rlarivee AT CA.IBM DOT COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 3:48 PM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: cannot open tcp/ip driver
>
> Hello,
> make sure that the Tivoli Storage Manager server
> started task userid has an OMVS segment
> with a UID=0 and GID=0.
>
> Regards,
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Rejean Larivee
> Tivoli Storage Manager Level 2 Support
>
>
> Boe Franklin <boe.franklin AT DB DOT COM> on 07/19/2000 03:15:56 PM
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: cannot open tcp/ip driver
>
>
>
>
> Yes. We haven't implemented Tivoli 3.7 yet.
> We were on OS/390 2.4 and moved to OS/390 2.6.
> TCPIP is now more integrated with USS and TCPIP went from
> version 3.2 to CS 2.6.
> So I must be missing something in either my TCP setup or Tivoli setup.
> I didn't see anything in the docs that was OS/390 2.6/above specific.
> Thanks,
> Boe Franklin
> 410-308-6796
> Technical Services, Atrium
> Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rbs AT bu DOT edu [SMTP:rbs AT bu DOT edu]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 2:02 PM
> > To:   boe.franklin AT db DOT com
> > Subject:      Re: cannot open tcp/ip driver
> >
> > >No, it was just after an IPL...
> >
> > Boe - That makes everyone wonder why the IPL?  Did any of the OS guys
> >       change definitions or OS software since the last time TCP/IP was
> > started (which the IPL would activate)?  Did they IPL to put something
> > new into effect?  Very suspicious.                     Richard
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>