ADSM-L

Re: Restore times GUI vs command line

2000-05-10 22:21:03
Subject: Re: Restore times GUI vs command line
From: Angelo DeAngelis <Angelo_DeAngelis AT TIVOLI DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 22:21:03 -0400
Bill, you are correct.   For faster recovery, especially for entire machines, It
is MUCH better to use the command line.    The Gui over-head
   during file examination process  causes this.   Also, using -quite plus
tweaking mountpoints help.   The performance guide gives examples.

Regards,
Angelo DeAngelis/Tivoli Systems
Tivoli Storage Management
 National SE Support Team


Bill Sherrill <billsh AT US.IBM DOT COM> on 05/10/2000 02:05:12 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>

To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: Angelo DeAngelis/Tivoli Systems)
Subject:  Re: Restore times GUI vs command line




Gary,

     I have been involved in some dr test where I saw a significant
improvement in restore times while using the command line instead of the
gui.  I have also seen improvements with passing the -quiet parameter, this
parameter works well when restoring full drives or file systems because
people usually want to see single files restore.

Bill Sherrill
AIC
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>