Re: Incremental Forever
2000-05-01 16:20:30
Subject: |
Re: Incremental Forever |
From: |
Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU> |
Date: |
Mon, 1 May 2000 16:20:30 -0400 |
>I'd be interested in that too, as I can't imagine a reason to do
>incrementals forever. Generally, you do fulls every week (OK, at least on
>mainframes, there, I said it.) Then you incremental during the week, and
>full again on the weekend.
Except for library/tape management, why would you spend thousands of dollars
for TSM when you can perform that 1970s kind of backup with software that
comes with the operating system?
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Incremental Forever, Jack Palmadesso
- Re: Incremental Forever, Doug Fuerst
- Re: Incremental Forever,
Richard Sims <=
- Re: Incremental Forever, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: Incremental Forever, Allen S. Rout
- Re: Incremental Forever, MIKE HANLEY
- Re: Incremental Forever, Kelly Lipp
- Re: Incremental Forever, Nick Laflamme
- Re: Incremental Forever, Dirk Billerbeck
- Re: Incremental Forever, Richard L. Rhodes
- Re: Incremental Forever, Doug Fuerst [mailto:djfirst
- Re: Incremental Forever, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
|
|
|