Re: Copy versions.
2000-04-03 08:21:50
1st: no. maybe you could trick it, but the intent of a copy pool is to
be an off-site mirror of your on-site pools.
2nd: yes, set the destination (of the archive copygroup of the mgmtclass
you are using)
to the pool you want - tape pool is perfectly OK.
Henrik Hansson wrote:
>
> Hi,
> 2 questions
>
> First about no. of versions in storage pools.
> I would like to keep 5 versions of my copy pool and just 2 versions of my
> primary storage pool. I use DRM to keep track of my copy pool tapes.
> Is it possible to do it this way or must my Primary pool and the Copy pool
> keep the same number of versions
>
> Second about archiving.
> If I do archiving first the files are stored in my Primary pool and then
> coupied to my archive pool I think. If I don't want the files in my primary
> pool after they where copied to my Archive pool. Do I have to delete them
> manually or can it be done automatic.
> I want to archive buisness databases each month and store in a vault. But I
> just want them on tapes and not in my Primary storage pool. Is this
> possible?
>
> Regards
> Henrik Hansson
> Nomafa AB
> Tel + 46 35 14 73 00
> Fax + 46 35 14 73 99
--
Mr. Lindsay Morris
Mr. Lindsay Morris
Certified: AIX,ADSM, TSM, HACMP,SP
Gresham Enterprise Storage
lmorris AT openmic DOT com
606-253-8000
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Copy versions.,
Lindsay Morris <=
|
|
|