At SHARE I heard that tsm 3.7 on mvs is up to 30% better
than adsm 3.1.*.  Also your os/390 level can make a big difference. The
tcpip in 2.6 is much much better, cpu-wise, than 1.3.

The biggest cpu pig is expire inventory; I run it just once a week on
Saturday.

--
--------------------------
--------------------------
Bill Colwell
Bill Colwell
C. S. Draper Lab
Cambridge, Ma.
bcolwell AT draper DOT com
--------------------------
In <2DE85C3F90E6D111AADC00805FE6FD8D055AF82B AT exchange401.comp.pge DOT com>, 
on 03/24/00
In <2DE85C3F90E6D111AADC00805FE6FD8D055AF82B AT exchange401.comp.pge DOT com>, 
on 03/24/00
   at 03:56 PM, "Coles, Peter" <PJCg AT PGE DOT COM> said:

>Hello all,
>I am somewhat new to the administration side of the ADSM and I have the
>task of upgrading a 6 year old ADSM (AIX) implementation. I am seriously
>considering implementing TSM 3.7 on our OS/390 platform. I have heard
>some horror story of ADSM's performance in the MVS-OS/390 environment,
>but I have also heard there has been considerable performance
>enhancements to TSM 3.7 running on OS/390.

>Does anyone have any insight or views on this??
>Peter Coles
>DCIOC Storage Manager
>Pacific Gas and Electric Company
>pjcg AT pge DOT com
>805-545-4237