Re: ADSM /400 performance?

ADSM-L

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ADSM /400 performance?

2000-03-23 16:21:43

Subject:	Re: ADSM /400 performance?
From:	"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold AT ARNET.COM DOT AR>
Date:	Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:21:43 -0300

100 Mbits, 3570 and 3590.
The network is NOT a limitation.  I verified this several times.
The tape drive waits for the client.  It is a poor performance if we compare
it with, for example, Unix servers.  But AS/400 has a very particular
technology (I love it!).  Storage pool in disk or in tape are not critical
factors neither.
Rafael.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
ADSM /400 performance?, Don Schmeichel Re: ADSM /400 performance?, MIKE HANLEY Re: ADSM /400 performance?, MIKE HANLEY ADSM /400 performance?, Rafael J. Goldschmidt ADSM /400 performance?, Rafael J. Goldschmidt Re: ADSM /400 performance?, MIKE HANLEY ADSM /400 performance?, Rafael J. Goldschmidt Re: ADSM /400 performance?, Rafael J. Goldschmidt <=

Previous by Date:	ADSM /400 performance?, Rafael J. Goldschmidt
Next by Date:	[no subject], MIKE HANLEY
Previous by Thread:	ADSM /400 performance?, Rafael J. Goldschmidt
Next by Thread:	Residency Announcement: ST-0454 Integrating Tivoli Storage Manager with Tivoli Enterprise, Charlotte Brooks
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]