Re: Windows Admin GUI
2000-02-25 12:28:08
Subject: |
Re: Windows Admin GUI |
From: |
Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU> |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:28:08 -0500 |
>Let's argue to get the Web interface to work better
Worth a try.
>That is the future, whether we like it or not.
Well, it doesn't *have* to be. It saves developers work, but at the
obvious expense of performance and customer satisfaction. The customer's
money supports development, and should specify the nature of the product
that one pays for, which has to meet business needs. Standard statement
of "tail should not wag dog". I believe we're about a year and a half
into waiting for a satisfactory web interface - and probably time for
development to admit that it's not a realistic objective anymore.
Richard Sims, BU
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, (continued)
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Andreas Buser
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Patterson Barry J
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Winfried Heilmann
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Rolph, Steve, ITS
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Angelo DeAngelis
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Kelly Lipp
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Tab Trepagnier
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Robinson, Cris
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Doug Thorneycroft
- Re: Windows Admin GUI,
Richard Sims <=
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Kelly Lipp
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Prather, Wanda
- Windows Admin GUI, Rafael J. Goldschmidt
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Bronson, David
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Kelly Lipp
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Pearson, Dave
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Pearson, Dave
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, ng spike
- Windows Admin GUI, Loon , E . J . van - SPLXM [mailto:Eric-van.Loon
- Re: Windows Admin GUI, Winfried Heilmann [mailto:winfried.heilmann
|
|
|