Re: Largest *SM DB
2000-02-03 18:24:09
And split it up, they should. You shouldn't have a database this large
unless you're from Texas. We aren't Oracle database administrators, who all
believe bigger is better.
I think the current support recommendation is to keep it under 20G. The
last site I visited with a 50G+ database was taking too long to back up the
database.
For those of you with large DBs - how is your DB backup time?
Bill Smoldt SSSI
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf
Of
Joshua S. Bassi
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 2:17 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Largest *SM DB
Keith,
This was talked about on the list about 6 months ago. I believe the
largest DB reported here was 70GB. Most customers end up splitting
the *SM implementation at that point into one or more servers.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Joshua S. Bassi
Senior Technical Consultant
Symatrix Technology, Inc.
jbassi AT gloryworks DOT com
(503) 702-3371
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Largest *SM DB, Keith Nelson
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Mooney Mark
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Joshua S. Bassi
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Richard Cowen
- FW: Largest *SM DB, Keith Nelson
- Re: Largest *SM DB, bbullock
- Re: Largest *SM DB,
Bill Smoldt <=
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Kelly Lipp
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Joshua S. Bassi
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Kelly Lipp
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Henk ten Have
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Bill Colwell
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Tab Trepagnier
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Cook, Dwight E
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Steven P Roder
- Re: Largest *SM DB, wawork Wash
- Re: Largest *SM DB, Scott Fluegge
|
|
|