>Yes, this is the only thing I could think of as well. Could you
>rephrase/expand the last sentence above? How would the drives "share
>between the pools"? I thought that under this scenario the drives would
>not be "shared amongst pools".
>
>Thanks for the suggestion.
>
>Shane

What I mean is that a specific drive will not be assigned to a specific
pool.  The assignment doesn't have to go below the level of the
deviceclass.


Nick Cassimatis
nickpc AT us.ibm DOT com

If you don't have the time to do it right the first time, where will you
find the time to do it again?