I'm guessing that your using the AIX version of ADSM?

I know that with the NT OS you don't really want to play around with the
dates alot.
We did Y2oK testing and forn problems with NT when we went backwards in time
after rolling forward.
We ended up rebuilding the NT server and all was well. Maybe unix is just a
picky?

CR

__________________________________________________
Cris Robinson
Sr. Technical Analyst
Enterprise Storage Management / TSM (ADSM)
Liberty Mutual Insurance
Portsmouth, New Hampshire
603.431.8400.54837
mailto:cris.robinson AT libertymutual DOT com

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Francisco Molero [SMTP:fmolero AT YAHOO DOT COM]
        Sent:   Sunday, January 02, 2000 10:41 PM
        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        Subject:        query about Y2K

        Hi colleagues,
        we have noticed a strange behaviour in ADSM. We have a

        machine running ADSM server 3.1.2.20. In november we
        changed the date from november to january of 2000. We
        were doing a lot of tests with good results. After
        that we changed the date to november. Then, the first
        day of year, the actlog showed in the actlog the
        entries of test that we ran in november. We think this
        behaviour is why the log is a table, and it has
        registered the activity in the system. This entries
        weren't removed in  the actlog, and it is how ADSM
        should work. Is it the normal behaviour?
        .
        Regards and Happy New Year

        __________________________________________________
        Do You Yahoo!?
        Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
        http://messenger.yahoo.com