ADSM-L

Re: drmedia question

2015-10-04 17:37:12
Subject: Re: drmedia question
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
This is a copy pool but since the volume has been checked out, I get an
error
when I try to delete the volume.  ADSM tells me it is not defined to a
storage
pool...

Scott







"Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU> on 11/24/99 11:52:02 AM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>

To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: Scott Fluegge/COR/MLW/US/venatorgroup)
Subject:  Re: drmedia question



If this is a copy pool volume, you have to DELETE the volume with
DISCARDDATA=YES.

ADSM will update the data base to reflect the fact that all the files that
were on the volume no longer have a copy in that copy pool.

The next time you run BACKUP STGPOOL primarypoolname copypoolname

ADSM will put a new copy of all those files into the COPY pool, along with
any files that have just entered the primary pool.  It won't be an exact
rebuild of the dead tape, but it serves the purpose.

************************************************************************
Wanda Prather
The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab
443-778-8769
wanda_prather AT jhuapl DOT edu

"Intelligence has much less practical application than you'd think" -
Scott Adams/Dilbert
************************************************************************




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Fluegge [SMTP:sfluegge AT VENATORGROUP DOT COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 12:36 PM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      drmedia question
>
> Well gang, I need some help again!
>
> I have a 3590 tape that has been destroyed.  The volume was on its way to
> our
> off-site location.  How can I get the system to rebuild the volume?  I
> read in
> the manual that only primary storage pool volumes can be marked destroyed!
> I
> tried the move data command but since the volume has been checked out of
> the
> library, that obviously won't work...
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>