Re: Antwort: Wanted: A working requirements process
1999-11-24 11:54:56
Subject: |
Re: Antwort: Wanted: A working requirements process |
From: |
"Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU> |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:54:56 -0500 |
I think there are a WHOLE LOT of ADSM sites that never see a Tivoli rep!
************************************************************************
Wanda Prather
The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab
443-778-8769
wanda_prather AT jhuapl DOT edu
"Intelligence has much less practical application than you'd think" -
Scott Adams/Dilbert
************************************************************************
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mecki M. [SMTP:rmeschon AT OTELO.IBMMAIL DOT COM]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 6:39 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Antwort: Wanted: A working requirements process
>
> Hi Jerry,
>
> I fully agree!
>
> Also there's a problem for project-workers like me:
> no chance to see a Tivoli rep - and the customer instances don't provide
> that forwarding of requirements.
> So although working with *SM I'll never get heard in the actual
> implementation of the process!
>
> The idea of the ADSM-R list was great and I think smomething like this
> should be the solution!
>
> Regards
> Mecki
|
|
|