ADSM-L

Re: 3570 XL tapes

1999-12-06 08:18:55
Subject: Re: 3570 XL tapes
From: Fabiano Costa <fr.costa AT SERVICE.COM DOT BR>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 11:18:55 -0200
Loon,

        I have the same problem but with 3590! The Est.Capacity parameter is
intended Max.Capacity now and I solve this problem seting 0 to estcap. You
cannot change this parameter to 0, you need to create new devclass and not
specifying estcap in the command line.


"Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" wrote:

> Hi TSM-ers!
> I have just started a copy stgpool to recreate my copypool with new 3570 XL
> tapes. I did a q vol for one of the new volumes and I was surprised to see
> an estimated capacity of 5000! That's strange, because the tape has a native
> capacity of 7 Gb.
> The drive's microcode is at the highest level.
> So it seems that ADSM is NOT 3570XL aware. Is there anybody who can shed
> some light on this?
> Thanks in advance!
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon

--
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fabiano R. da Costa
Fabiano R. da Costa
SERVICE IT Solutions - http://www.service.com.br
Rua Helena, 280 cj. 1106 - Sco Paulo - SP
Fone/Fax: 011-30401960
mailto:fr.costa AT service.com DOT br
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 3570 XL tapes, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
    • Re: 3570 XL tapes, Fabiano Costa <=