Re: Destroyed tape
1999-09-17 13:52:37
=> On Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:00:54 -0600, bbullock <bbullock AT MICRON DOT COM>
said:
> WOAH, don't do a "delete vol ... discardd=yes" on the primary tape,
> it will delete all the references to the copypool backup. What you want to
> do is mark the tape as 'destroyed' (update vol ... access=destroyed). In the
> future, if there is a restore request for that data, ADSM will request the
> off-site copy to complete the restore.
I've now seen several people report this. I just want to restate, to make
sure that I understand what's being claimed.
If I have three copies of a file scattered across a stgpool, and some copies,
and I delete vol... a volume with _one_ of those copies, _all_ of the copies
all across my stgpools are deleted. Is this correct?
Allen S. Rout
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Destroyed tape, Jordan, Chris (ELS)
- Re: Destroyed tape, bbullock
- Re: Destroyed tape, Richard Sims
- Destroyed tape, Richard Sims
- Re: Destroyed tape, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: Destroyed tape, Mauro M. TINELLI
- Re: Destroyed tape, Richard Sims
- Re: Destroyed tape, Richard C. Dempsey
- Re: Destroyed tape, Nick Cassimatis
- Re: Destroyed tape, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: Destroyed tape,
Allen S. Rout <=
- Re: Destroyed tape, bbullock
- Re: Destroyed tape, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Destroyed tape, Richard Sims
- Destroyed tape, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: Destroyed tape, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
|
|
|