Re: disk-pool performance
1999-09-06 10:54:13
R. Masa, Ramesh,
I'm sure the client to volume holds true for direct to tape backup, as
a drive per client is assigned, but t'ill now I havent't heard the one
on one client->disk stgpool volume strategy. As far as my knowledge
goes all diskpool volumes are evenly filled with client data
regardless the number of clients attached at any one time. Inside
story is that ADSM assigns a disk read/write thread per defined disk
storage pool volume, so having multiple volumes in a disk storage pool
would certainly help write performance for that storage pool. If your
running UNIX ADSM assigning a disk per volume wouldn't be a bad idea.
Under NT, this depends if your using RAID or not, if not you can
follow the UNIX strategy otherwise well, commonsense and a good bit of
RAID knowledge will ultimately give you your answer.
So far for NT and disk storage pools I've always gone for RAID-5 (3+
disks) and made as many volumes as there were disks available (not
backed by any performance measurements).
If anyone has some real world experience on optimal ADSM
DB/log/diskpool configurations I would sure like te hear about it.
Walter Ridderhof, Mainland Sequoia
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: disk-pool performance
Author: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> at INET-1
Date: 9/2/99 10:17 AM
It is not recommended to have one large storage pool volume. As each volume
can allow only one client at any given time to write to it, you should have
at least the same number of stg-pool volumes as the number of clients you
will backup in parallel. This ensures that each client gets a storage pool
volume to dump data to on the server.
Also, if you have multiple disks spread out the volumes over these disks for
better I/O performance.
Hope this helps.
Ramesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masa, Ralf [mailto:masa.ralf AT COMBIBLOC DOT COM]
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 1999 9:11 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: disk-pool performance
>
>
> Hi ADSM-Folks,
>
> for performance reason: is there any recommendation for the size of
> disk-storagepool-volumes.
> I mean, if I have one disk and one storage pool on this disk,
> is it better
> to have one large stg-pool volume or shoul I split the disk
> into many small
> stg-pool volumes ?
> TIA
>
> R. Masa
> masa.ralf AT combibloc DOT com
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- disk-pool performance, Masa , Ralf
- disk-pool performance, Masa, Ralf
- Re: disk-pool performance, ADSML
- Re: disk-pool performance, Viswanathan, Ramesh (CNA)
- Re: disk-pool performance, Allen S. Rout
- Re: disk-pool performance, Viswanathan, Ramesh (CNA)
- Re: disk-pool performance, Joshua Bassi
- Re: disk-pool performance, Nathan King
- Re: disk-pool performance,
Walter Ridderhof <=
- Re: disk-pool performance, Allen S. Rout
- Re: disk-pool performance, Paul Fielding
- Re: disk-pool performance, Joshua Bassi
- Re: disk-pool performance, Walter Ridderhof
- Re: disk-pool performance, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: disk-pool performance, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
|
|
|