ADSM-L

Re: Adsm server 3.1.2.40, problems?

1999-09-02 04:55:00
Subject: Re: Adsm server 3.1.2.40, problems?
From: Matthias Hensel <Matthias.Hensel AT SCHERING DOT DE>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
Date: Thursday, September 02, 1999 8:55 AM


>Now when we solved our problems with the ADSM Upgrade from 3.1.2.22 to
>3.1.2.40 I like to give feedback about the solution:
>
>To remind the situation:
>We have an ADSM server (AIX 4.3) with a 3494 libray and 3590E drives
>connected running level 3.1.2.22. Due to some reasons we wanted to upgrade
>to 3.1.2.40. When we did so, the server had problems accessing the tape
>volumes. (We deleted the drives and redefined them to ADSM after the
>upgrade). When doing a restore the server issued the error "data
>unavailable to server" and in the actlog was found "no drives available to
>server".
>Nevertheless it was able to create new tapes. For example it was possible
>to migrate the diskpools when updating all "filling tapes" as read-only.
>
>Since we could not be productive with this problems we went back to
>3.1.2.22. Now the server got problems accessing the volumes that were
>created in level 3.1.2.40.
>
>This problem was escalated to IBM as IY03199. The problem was, that in
>level 3.1.2.22 the 3590E-drives were recognised internal as being
>4mm-drives. Therefore all volumes that were created were also marked as
>being 4mm-tapes. Why ever, this bug was corrected in 3.1.2.40. That means,
>when we redefined the drives after upgrading to 3.1.2.40 our drives were
>found as being 3590E-drives but the volumes that were created in 3.1.2.22
>still were 4mm-tapes in the eyes of ADSM for which ADSM correctly found no
>drive installed.
>
>IBM send us an emergency fix server that contained an dsmserv-image with a
>command that updated all these volumes as being 3590e tapes again.
>
>So be aware of having problems when you started using 3590e tapes with ADSM
>server level 3.1.2.22 and then upgrade to a higher level.
>
>Yours Matthias
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>