Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40
2015-10-04 17:42:38
Hello,
First question: Is it native ATM that you're using or are you using CIP o=
ver
ATM. If it's the second one you'll never get a performance of 15Mb/sec.
We've also an ATM configuration and the most we get is 11Mb/sec by using
CIP on ATM.
Second question: Which remote hosts are you backing up. Microsoft or Unix
servers and what OS?
Regards,
_________________ Lauer Edouard ____________________
______ Prod. informatique ____ Syst=E8mes Ouverts ________
__ * +352 4590 3889 __ * Edouard.Lauer AT bil-dexia DOT com __
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Musselman [SMTP:musselman AT SIERRALLC DOT COM]
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 1:44 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40
>
> I am currently backing up to a tape storage pool using an ATM 155mbps
> ring.
> I am not using a disk copy storage pool. I am backing up directly to
> tape.
> Currently, my average transmission rate is 2.2 MB/sec or roughly 7.6 GB
> per
> hour. IBM states that a 15 MB/sec rate is possible. Does anyone have =
a
> performance tuning tips that can help me speed up the transmission rate=
?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> An electronic message is not binding on its sender.
> Any message referring to a binding engagement must be confirmed in writ=
ing
> and duly signed.
>
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
An electronic message is not binding on its sender.
Any message referring to a binding engagement must be confirmed in writin=
g
and duly signed.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40, Jack Musselman
- Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40, Lauer Edouard
- Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40, Roger Hohmann
- Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40, Kells Kearney
- Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40, Jack Musselman
- Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40, Jack Musselman
- Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40, Wayne T. Smith
- Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40, Richard Sims
- Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40, Henk ten Have
- Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40,
ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L <=
- Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
|
|
|