ADSM-L

Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40

1999-06-24 01:41:22
Subject: Re: ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40
From: Lauer Edouard <Edouard.Lauer AT BIL-DEXIA DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 07:41:22 +0200
Hello,

First question: Is it native ATM that you're using or are you using CIP over
ATM. If it's the second one you'll never get a performance of 15Mb/sec.
We've also an ATM configuration and the most we get is 11Mb/sec by using
CIP on ATM.
Second question: Which remote hosts are you backing up. Microsoft or Unix
servers and what OS?

Regards,
_________________ Lauer Edouard ____________________
______ Prod. informatique ____ Systèmes Ouverts ________
__ * +352 4590 3889 __ * Edouard.Lauer AT bil-dexia DOT com __


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Musselman [SMTP:musselman AT SIERRALLC DOT COM]
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 1:44 AM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      ADSM V3 and 3590 Performance Tuning on a J40
> 
> I am currently backing  up to a tape storage pool using an ATM 155mbps
> ring.
> I am not using a disk copy storage pool.  I am backing up directly to
> tape.
> Currently, my average transmission rate is 2.2 MB/sec or roughly 7.6 GB
> per
> hour.  IBM states that a 15 MB/sec rate is possible.  Does anyone have a
> performance tuning tips that can help me speed up the transmission rate?
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> ==============================================================
> 
> An electronic message is not binding on its sender.  
> Any message referring to a binding engagement must be confirmed in writing
> and duly signed.
> 
> ==============================================================
> 

=============================================================
An electronic message is not binding on its sender.
Any message referring to a binding engagement must be confirmed in writing and 
duly signed.

============================================================