ADSM-L

Re: Request for Proposal - New ADSM Server

1999-05-27 16:10:36
Subject: Re: Request for Proposal - New ADSM Server
From: Donald Coleman <coleman AT POST.QUEENSU DOT CA>
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 16:10:36 -0400
At 03:41 PM 1999-05-27 -0400, you wrote:
>Date:     May 27, 1999             Time: 3:22 PM
>From:     Jerry Lawson
>          The Hartford Insurance Group
>(860)  547-2960          jlawson AT thehartford DOT com
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>We have been using ADSM on MVS for several years now, and I have a good
>background in that area.  However, we now have a group of users
>(approximately 400 desktop users) that will be moving to another office
>building, and backing up to our mainframe will not be practical.  I proposed
>to the customer that they use a local ADSM server, and they like the idea.
>The question now on the table is "which one"?
>
>At this point we are open to the platform choice. The area will have
>expertise in both NT and Unix.  This is a customer support area, so NT, Sun,
>AIX, and possibly HP are options.  My question to the list is as follows:
>
>If you had the option of platform, which one would you pick to support a 400
>user desktop environment? (No servers at this time.)  Is NT robust enough to
>handle it, or would AIX or Solaris be a better choice?  How big would you
>make the server, and which Tape solution would you recommend?
>
  We currently handle 1,500 clients (servers and desktops) with a RS/6000
model 7043-140. I currently have 13 GB of database space (mirrored, 26 GB in
total) and 30 GB in primary backup pool space.

  Tape storage is 4 IBM 7331-305 tape libraries (Exabyte Technology) with a
current inventory of 1.3 TB.

The processor appears to be robust enough to handle our load (we move about
25 GB a day). I would not reccomend IBM peripherals (disk & tape). The tape
libraries are a real pain. I seem to have to replace a drive a month. Tapes
become unreadable. Totally unsatisfactory.  I have one IBM disk (7204-325
4.5 GB differential SCSI) that I have had to replace the dive 4 times since
December.

 For tapes, I would recommend AIT technology. My readings are that this
technology is more reliable than DLT or Exabyte.


 -----------------------------------------------------------
   Don Coleman,
   Queen's University Information Technology Services
   Kingston, Ont. Canada  K7L 3N6
   Tel: (613) 533-2034  Fax: (613) 533-2168
   Email: Coleman AT Post.QueensU DOT CA
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>