ADSM-L

Re: Orphan tapes in PRIVATE status

1999-02-04 07:55:46
Subject: Re: Orphan tapes in PRIVATE status
From: Nathan King <nathan.king AT USAA DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 06:55:46 -0600
Yes. I saw this happen just the other day with an ADSM V3.1.2.0 server on
Windows NT.
The Server attempted a database backup, but ran into SCSI problems. However
it marked a tape
as private. I was confused though why it was marked 'data' instead of
'dbbackup'.

Nathan

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Prather, Wanda [SMTP:PrathW1 AT CENTRAL.SSD.JHUAPL DOT EDU]
        Sent:   Wednesday, February 03, 1999 3:34 PM
        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        Subject:        Orphan tapes in PRIVATE status

        ADSM V2.1.5.13 on AIX 4.2, STK9710 tape library

        I have just found a bunch of tapes in my library that are not
defined in
        STGPOOLS or VOLHISTORY, but are marked PRIVATE instead of SCRATCH.

        We do not DEFINE any volumes to the STGPOOLS manually, all free
tapes in the
        library should be in SCRATCH status.
        Library is dedicated to this one ADSM server.

        Many of these tapes I cannot find at all in the activity log (they
could
        have been in this state a LONG time).
        But some of them I can see had mount failures:

        ANR9999D Mount error  xxxxxxx
        ANR1404W Scratch volume mount request denied - mount failed

        The mount failures occurred at different times for different tapes,
and were
        all due to some explainable temporary problem with a drive or the
tape
        robot.

        It looks as though when a mount fails for SCRATCH, ADSM is marking
that tape
        as PRIVATE, even though there is no message to that effect.
        Can anybody confirm that is what really happens?

        Thanks.
        ***************************************************************
        Wanda Prather
        The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab
        443-778-8769
        wanda_prather AT jhuapl DOT edu

        "Intelligence has much less practical application than you'd think"
-
        Scott Adams/Dilbert
        Scott Adams/Dilbert
        ***************************************************************
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>