ADSM-L

Re: NT restore performance for small files

2015-10-04 17:47:36
Subject: Re: NT restore performance for small files
From: Hensel, Matthias <Matthias.Hensel AT SCHERING DOT DE>
To: <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>     Two more items I like to discuss:
>
>     1) Tuning: What about client compression? Does turning off has
>impact
>     on restore performance? Do I have to expect more space to be needed
>
>     within ADSM, or does hardware compression equalize the space
>needed?
>
>     2) Conceptional: We think about tuning ADSM as backup tool to be
>able
>     to provide adequate disaster restore times. That is ok. Of course
>IBM
>     can expect ADSM Users to configure their clients according to
>     proposals. But at a given level. For my opinion IBM cannot expect
>that
>     ADSM users do half the world in customizing to achieve better
>     performance. I have the uncanny feeling that ADSM may not be
>adequate
>     to todays needs in comparision to other tools (including those that
>do
>     not use the network for backup and therefore are faster).
>
>     It is very hard to explain ADSM as THE tool to customers when
>steadily
>     getting poor restore times in cases of big restore requests.
>
>     Am I alone with this expectations?
>
>     Matthias
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>