Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters
2015-10-04 17:48:52
>I disagree.
>I maintained ADSM on an IBM SP node with 100mb ethernet & FDDI. Other
boxes
>being backed up on FDDI were originally coming through the routers &
>switches through the 100mb card on our server. Its throughput was about
>that of a 10mb ethernet LAN. Our LAN personnel spoke of the overhead of
the
>routers & switches changing ethernet to FDDI traffic. Backup speed resumed
>at several MB/sec after we added a FDDI card to the ADSM server. I know
>virtually nothing about LAN configuration. Fortunately we were able to
>throw money at the problem in the form of a FDDI card to provide a cure.
>Others may be successful in LAN tuning.
>
>Randy Eggert
>MAPCO, Inc.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jones, Anthony [mailto:Jones4A AT KOCHIND DOT COM]
>Sent: Friday, January 22, 1999 8:31 AM
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>Subject: Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters
>
>
>Why so much hardware. The cost effective way, would be to have the
>connection from the ADSM server to the network be of one type and have
>routers and switches funnel the data from the others to the ADSM server.
>Adding multiple nics of so different topologies will do nothing but slow
>your server down trying to process them all, it you can get them to work
>together.
>
>Anthony Jones
>ADSM Administrator
>Koch Industries, Inc.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [SMTP:Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT NL]
>> Sent: Friday, January 22, 1999 7:58 AM
>> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> Subject: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters
>>
>> Hi ADSM-ers!
>> I'm thinking about buying an ADSM server for Windows NT.
>> Clients need to be able to connect to this server through 16 Mb. Token
>> Ring,
>> 100 Mb. Ethernet and FDDI, so the server I have in mind will have 4
>> network
>> adapters.
>> Some people over here say this will be a problem for Windows NT.
>> Are there any people out there who can say something about this from
>> experience?
>> Thanks for any reply!
>> Kindest regards,
>> Eric van Loon
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters, (continued)
- Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters, David R. Beardsley
- Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters, Tjeerd Saijoen
- Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters, Ross, Mitch
- Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters, Michael Abel
- Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters, Shane
- Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters, Jones, Anthony
- Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters, Jones , Anthony [mailto:Jones4A
- Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters, Jones , Anthony [mailto:Jones4A
- Windows NT server and multiple network adapters, Loon , E . J . van - SPLXM [mailto:Eric-van.Loon
- Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters,
Eggert , Randall <=
- Re: Windows NT server and multiple network adapters, Dusedau , Stefan
|
|
|