Re: Delete volume - input requested
1999-01-18 21:16:13
Subject: |
Re: Delete volume - input requested |
From: |
Bruce Elrick <belrick AT HOME DOT COM> |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 19:16:13 -0700 |
David...
I think a lot of ADSM users (administrators) do not have a full grasp
(unfortunately) of the difference between volumes, libvols, and volhist entries
like dbb and exports. Given that, I could see alot of them not realizing that
said tapes would not be used at all by ADSM until they changed the libv back to
scratch or defined them into a stgpool themselves. Thus they might 'lose'
tapes.
I've written scripts to reconcile:
3494 category for private (accessed using mtlib)
<=>
ADSM's libv's in private status (accessed with q libv or select)
<=>
the union of (stgpool vols of the right devclasses) and (volhist entries of
type=dbb)
(could also add volhist entries of type export, but we don't use that)
as well as reconcile:
3494 category for scratch
<=>
ADSM's libv's in scratch status
and find that inconsistancies crop up.
That being said, I agree that consistancy would require that the libv be left
as private. I would want, however, some way to reconcile things that is not
hand-coded or as fallible as the current scheme of 'last use' which itself can
get out of date.
Cheers...
Bruce
--
Bruce Elrick, Ph.D.
Bruce Elrick, Ph.D.
belrick AT home DOT com
http://members.home.net/belrick/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Delete volume - input requested, David E. Bohm
- Re: Delete volume - input requested,
Bruce Elrick <=
- Re: Delete volume - input requested, Dusedau, Stefan
- Re: Delete volume - input requested, bbullock
- Delete volume - input requested, David E. Bohm
- Re: Delete volume - input requested, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Delete volume - input requested, Hilton Tina
- Re: Delete volume - input requested, Bill Sherrill
- Delete volume - input requested, David E . Bohm [mailto:bohm
|
|
|