2nd update

excuse me for these repetitive emails: the situation is much more clearer
now:

the solution for us is:

no domain coded in client option set
"domain c:" coded in the local dsm.opt

With these parameters, saying "dsmc incr", we get what we want, i.e. a
backup of C:.

The problem is that the domain in client option set, gets interpreted as an
addition to the default of domain \\nodenam\\c: !

Thanks a lot for your comprehension...

rl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
> Sent: Friday, 11. December 1998 15:14
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      FW: Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!
>
> Update:
>
> in the server optset, we have "domain c:" hard coded!
>
> It means the double scan is logical with "domain \\uncname\c$" coded in
> the
> dsm.opt!
>
> Nevertheless, with no coding of domain in the dsm.opt, we should not get a
> backup of \\uncname\c$ !!
>
>
> rl
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
> > Sent: Friday, 11. December 1998 15:09
> > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject:      RE: Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!
> >
> > ok. With no domain coded or with "domain \\uncname\c$" coded in the
> > dsm.opt, we get double scanning of every file, once for the uncname,
> then
> > once more for the C:
> >
> > The only way to get normal scanning is to code "domain C:" in the
> dsm.opt.
> >
> > I think that double scan should be avoided in every case!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rene Lambelet
> > Nestec SA - 55, Av. Nestle - CH-1800 Vevey
> > Tel: ++41'21'924'35'43 / Fax: ++41'21'924'45'89
> > E-Mail: rene.lambelet AT nestle DOT com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rbs AT bu DOT edu [SMTP:rbs AT bu DOT edu]
> > Sent: Friday, 11. December 1998 14:20
> > To:   Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
> > Subject:      Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!
> >
> > Rene - You didn't tell us what was in your options for Domain, but in
> >        any case, the ADSM behavior you report doesn't sound right.
> > Try playing with your options when you run simply 'dsmc i' and try
> > to isolate when the doubling occurs.         Richard Sims, BU