Re: Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!
1998-12-11 09:08:30
Subject: |
Re: Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!! |
From: |
"Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF." <Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM> |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Dec 1998 15:08:30 +0100 |
ok. With no domain coded or with "domain \\uncname\c$" coded in the dsm.opt,
we get double scanning of every file, once for the uncname, then once more
for the C:
The only way to get normal scanning is to code "domain C:" in the dsm.opt.
I think that double scan should be avoided in every case!
Regards,
Rene Lambelet
Nestec SA - 55, Av. Nestle - CH-1800 Vevey
Tel: ++41'21'924'35'43 / Fax: ++41'21'924'45'89
E-Mail: rene.lambelet AT nestle DOT com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rbs AT bu DOT edu [SMTP:rbs AT bu DOT edu]
> Sent: Friday, 11. December 1998 14:20
> To: Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
> Subject: Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!
>
> Rene - You didn't tell us what was in your options for Domain, but in
> any case, the ADSM behavior you report doesn't sound right.
> Try playing with your options when you run simply 'dsmc i' and try
> to isolate when the doubling occurs. Richard Sims, BU
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
- Re: Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!,
Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF. <=
- FW: Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
- FW: Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Performance problems with ADSM/VM 2.1.0.17 and restore of inactiv e files, Richard Sims |
Next by Date: |
FW: Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF. |
Previous by Thread: |
Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF. |
Next by Thread: |
FW: Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF. |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|