In <092934F94949D211B1AD00805FBE36C93F56A2 AT LMIG-MSG-01.lmig DOT com>, on
12/08/98
   at 12:30 PM, "Robinson, Cris" <Cris.Robinson AT LIBERTYMUTUAL DOT COM> said:

>Yes, the list is long and this is not the way I wanted to do this so let's
>not go there. We don't want any
>program files what so ever to be backed up and turned out to be harder and
>harder as new applications
>were added every week. We only use ADSM for DATA recovery and not system
>recovery.


>Anyway... the platform is as follows:
>We have Version 3.1.0.2 of ADSM for NT
>and client version 3.1.0.6 32 bit windows client ( NT workstation  in my
>case, most of the company is Win95)

>__________________________________________________
>Cris Robinson
>Sr. Technical Analyst
>Enterprise Storage Management / ADSM
>Liberty Mutual Insurance
>Portsmouth, New Hampshire
>603.431.8400.54837
>mailto:cris.robinson AT libertymutual DOT com


>If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging!

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Healy [SMTP:jhealy AT CHUBB DOT COM]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 1998 12:12 PM
>> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> Subject:      Re: Problem with Client Option Sets
>>
>> It seems like you have quite a bit of includes, first off what I try to do
>> is keep it real simple.
>> Just specify you domain in your case its all local and then just be very
>> explicit on what you exclude. By the way what type of client is this?

I know there were problems in the early v3 servers and clients.  You have
the current client, but your server is an old level.  Can you try this with
a 3.1.2.1 level server?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bill Colwell
Bill Colwell
C. S. Draper Lab
Cambridge, Ma.
bcolwell AT draper DOT com
-----------------------------------------------------------
=========================================================================