|
Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?
1998-11-23 13:07:17
|
Subject: |
Re: Why are tape mounts being requested? |
|
From: |
Jim Healy <jhealy AT CHUBB DOT COM> |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 1998 13:07:17 -0500 |
Linnea,
I've had a similar situation happen in the past in Version 2. I
had hoped it would be fixed in v3 but it appears like it hasn't . I had
originally opened a problem with IBM. Their answer amounted to: if the
primary storage pools get "too busy" they overflow into secondary storage.
I'm curious if this is what they'll tell you?
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Why are tape mounts being requested?, Nichols, Linnea
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Cyndi Pearce x7440
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Bill Colwell
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Joel Fuhrman
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Hilton Tina
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Kenneth Sparks
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Nichols, Linnea
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Kelly J. Lipp
- FW: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Nichols, Linnea
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?,
Jim Healy <=
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Leonard Boyle
- Re: FW: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Russell Street
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Jim Healy
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Hilton Tina [mailto:HiltonT
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Nichols , Linnea [SMTP:linnea.nichols
- Re: Why are tape mounts being requested?, Kelly J . Lipp [mailto:lipp
|
|
|
