Joanne,

You hit the point I think. It is working correctly when I use the dsmc i
command by hand, but not when the incremental backup is started through the
scheduler automatically. So can you give me an idea what is the difference
between this two modes?
Does dsmcsvc.exe (scheduler) start the dsmci.exe program, or is it a
completely different way of backing up.

Thanks, Roel


>Roel,
>
>Are you sure you didn't misspell anything or look at an old error log?
>I tried the level 0.5 client and it works.  If you issue dsmc i (default to
>the system drive), and you don't see any messages regarding saving
>registry key, then that is correct.
>
>Joanne Nguyen
>ADSM Client Development
>
>
>
>
>ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU on 10/26/98 12:08:30 AM
>Please respond to ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>cc:
>Subject: Re: REGBack NO option in NT-client not working.
>
>
>>Roel,
>>
>>The option is BACKUPRegistry and not REGBack.  Please try that.
>>
>>Joanne Nguyen
>>ADSM Client Development
>>
>
>You are right, but on the file I have used the correct syntax. Sorry
>that I used the wrong one in my mail.
>
>>
>>
>>ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU on 10/23/98 08:35:48 AM
>>Please respond to ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>>cc:
>>Subject: REGBack NO option in NT-client not working.
>>
>>
>>Does anyone have an idea how it is possible that I still receive the
>>message in the logfile that the registry was succesfully saved, when
>>I have the REGback NO option supplied in the dsm.opt file?
>>
>>The used implementation: BAclient V3.1 level 0.5 for NT
>>
>>Thanks, Roel
>>