ADSM-L

Question on new Win32 Client

1998-08-19 12:08:48
Subject: Question on new Win32 Client
From: Pete Tanenhaus <tanenhau AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 12:08:48 -0400
<<<< With the change of the ADSM client to use UNC names for the filespace (ie
 <<<< \\machinename\C$) does this remove the need for all drives to be assigned
 <<<< disk labels in order for them to be backed up? (If so,m it will remove the
 <<<< "easy" way to ensure thatr a drive was not backed up by ensuring it did
not
 <<<< have a label).

Yes, with the exception of removable media (floppy or CD Rom drives), volume
labels are no longer required.

I guess I always viewed the limitation of not being able to backup unlabeled
drives as a liability .....

Pete Tanenhaus, ADSM NT Client Development
---------------------- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on 08/19/98
9/98
11:54 AM ---------------------------


ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU on 08/19/98 08:53:44 AM
Please respond to ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:
Subject: Question on new Win32 Client


With the change of the ADSM client to use UNC names for the filespace (ie
\\machinename\C$) does this remove the need for all drives to be assigned
disk labels in order for them to be backed up? (If so,m it will remove the
"easy" way to ensure thatr a drive was not backed up by ensuring it did not
have a label).

Peter Thomas



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>