Re: ADSM newsgroup -Reply
1998-06-30 15:32:47
Nicholas Cassimatis wrote:
> I would also like to keep the list as a list. I have never seen a newsgroup
> that didn't end up having loads of posts trying to sell me something,
> promising
> get rick quick schemes, or advertising adult material. Plus posting to most
> newsgroups is an invitation to get spammed. Since this is my work e-mail, I'd
> rather avoid that, if possible.
For the same reason, I vote against a newsgroup.
> Yeah, the bulk of mail can be a pain (especially when you go on a 2 week
> vacation and don't go to the digest format!!!), but I find it worth my time to
> read throught the messages.
The advantage of this is that very very little mail is lost (even if I'm for
1 or 2 weeks not in my office) (and if it still happens, then only by
accident).
Greetinx, Lothar
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: ADSM newsgroup, (continued)
- Re: ADSM newsgroup, Tomas Hallin
- Re: ADSM newsgroup, Hanna Hahne
- ADSM newsgroup -Reply, Steve Fletcher
- Re: ADSM newsgroup, Brian Nick
- Re: ADSM newsgroup, Henk ten Have
- Re: ADSM newsgroup, Phil Chissell
- Re: ADSM newsgroup, Brown, Ed
- Re: ADSM newsgroup, Laszlo Nemeth
- ADSM newsgroup -Reply, Jerry Lawson
- Re: ADSM newsgroup, Donald W. Daniels/FFIC
- Re: ADSM newsgroup -Reply,
Lothar Guthmann <=
- Re: ADSM newsgroup, West Suhanic
- ADSM newsgroup, Anton Gubarkov [mailto:Anton.Gubarkov
- ADSM newsgroup -Reply, owner-adsm-l
|
|
|