Re: Collocation and Disaster Recovery
1998-06-12 19:05:21
Subject: |
Re: Collocation and Disaster Recovery |
From: |
Dan Curtis <vndob569 AT US.IBM DOT COM> |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jun 1998 19:05:21 -0400 |
Hello John
If this is a major concern, then you can collocate your copypools as
well. This implies the same
tape usage overhead, or greater than collocating primary pools. This aside it
decrease the tape mounts required
for your restore.
Regards
Daniel Curtis Level 1 ADSM support
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Collocation and Disaster Recovery, John Dawson
- Re: Collocation and Disaster Recovery, James SPORER
- Re: Collocation and Disaster Recovery, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: Collocation and Disaster Recovery,
Dan Curtis <=
- Re: Collocation and Disaster Recovery, Dan Curtis
- Re: Collocation and Disaster Recovery, John Dawson
- Re[2]: Collocation and Disaster Recovery, Carl Makin
- Re[2]: Collocation and Disaster Recovery, Carl Makin
- Re: Re[2]: Collocation and Disaster Recovery, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: Collocation and Disaster Recovery, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: Collocation and Disaster Recovery, John Tarella
- Re: Collocation and Disaster Recovery, Dan Giles
- Re: Collocation and Disaster Recovery, James SPORER [SMTP:james.sporer
- Re[2]: Collocation and Disaster Recovery, Carl Makin [SMTP:Carl.Makin
|
|
|