ADSM-L

Re: GUI speed versus command line

1998-06-10 14:42:36
Subject: Re: GUI speed versus command line
From: Mark Dyer <mark.dyer AT FLE.GMPT.GMEDS DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 14:42:36 -0400
Jeff,

Our experience is with ADSM V2 on AIX Server and UNIX Clients.

The GUI restores take longer because of the wait to display file data in
the GUI, especially when searching through inactive files.

If I execute a restore request from command line, I'm usually recovering
a bulk of data and know the path to that data.  I don't use the "-PICK"
option.  I don't know how the "-PICK" option will affect a commmand line
restore.  I've never done one.

Also,  the discussions on this list indicate that ADSM V3 is supposed
to improve GUI response times when querying inactive files for restores.

HTH

Jeff Connor wrote:
>
> I recall it being mentioned on this listserv that restores using the GUI
> client generally run slower than restores initiated from the command line.
> Does anyone know if this is this true and if so what is the cause of the
> overhead?  Got some users who are objecting to using the command line even
> if it performs better.. Thanks

--
Mark Dyer
Mark Dyer
Systems Administrator               e-mail: mark.dyer AT fle.gmpt.gmeds DOT com
Service Delivery - UNIX Team         voice: (810) 236-0373 [8-446]
                                       fax: (810) 236-9290 [8-446]

                     EDS North/West Region
                     Mail Stop 485-184-110
                     902 E. Hamilton Ave
                     Flint, MI  48550
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>