I've run restores from the GUI and command line on our NT servers, and
haven't noticed any difference in performance with Version 3.  In
Version 2 there was some trouble, especially with selecting inactive
versions of files to restore.  It could take hours just to make the
selection through the GUI, but one easy command from the command line.
With version 3 this is no longer a problem.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Connor [SMTP:connorj AT NIMO DOT COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 1998 1:47 PM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      GUI speed versus command line
>
> I recall it being mentioned on this listserv that restores using the
> GUI
> client generally run slower than restores initiated from the command
> line.
> Does anyone know if this is this true and if so what is the cause of
> the
> overhead?  Got some users who are objecting to using the command line
> even
> if it performs better.. Thanks