Re: ADSM vs Legato
1998-06-03 10:46:19
Thanks David, IBM or anyone, does ADSM support the ACSLS attachment?
David Chapa-WLDC18T <David_Chapa-WLDC18T AT css.mot DOT com> on 06/03/98
09:41:51
AM
To: Julie Phinney/Green Bay/Humana
cc:
Subject: RE: ADSM vs Legato
Julie-
the only way to communicate to an STK silo that is shared with a
mainframe is via their ACSLS, which is a control station for the silo.
The ACSLS manages the requests for mounts of tapes from the various
sources, mainframe, Legato Networker and Veritas NetBackup to name a
few. If ADSM will support the ACSLS attachment, it should work as well.
-David
David Chapa OnSite with Motorola
David Chapa OnSite with Motorola
Consulting Practice Manger (847) 523-1979
DataStaff, Inc
Schaumburg, IL
(847) 413-1144
david AT chapa DOT com
>----------
>From: Julie Phinney[SMTP:jphinney AT HUMANA DOT COM]
>Reply To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
>Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 1998 9:25 AM
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>Subject: ADSM vs Legato
>
>Legato is being considered at my company because (and this is just my
>understanding, could be wrong) Legato allows you to direct-connect backup
>clients to mainframe attached STK silos. Even when the mainframe is down.
>You'd need an AIX box or something for the Legato indexes to reside on.
>With ADSM there is no direct-connecting to those silos.
>Can anyone verify this? Can ADSM clients backup direct to the silos
>without running through the AIX box?
>Julie
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- ADSM vs Legato, Julie Phinney
- ADSM vs Legato, Julie Phinney
- Re: ADSM vs Legato,
Julie Phinney <=
- Re: ADSM vs Legato, John Groves
- Re: ADSM vs Legato, Greg Heis
- Re: ADSM vs Legato, Laszlo Nemeth
- Re: ADSM vs Legato, David Hendrix
- Re: ADSM vs Legato, Lindsay Morris
- Re: ADSM vs Legato, Matthew Warren
- Re: ADSM vs Legato, Ben Kokenge
- Re: ADSM vs Legato, Stidd, Sharon
- Re: ADSM vs Legato, Adrian P Challinor
- Re: ADSM vs Legato, David Hendrix
|
|
|