ADSM-L

Another NT authorization problem

1998-06-01 06:21:00
Subject: Another NT authorization problem
From: Jerry Lawson <jlawson%THEHARTFORD.COM AT internet.fedex DOT com>
To: ADSM-L%VM.MARIST.EDU AT internet.fedex DOT com
Date: Monday, June 01, 1998 10:21 PM
>Date:     June 1, 1998             Time: 10:33 PM
>From:     Jerry Lawson
>          The Hartford Insurance Group
>(860)  547-2960          jlawson AT thehartford DOT com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>I think I have the old "NT authentication" problem, but it is slightly
>I think I have the old "NT authentication" problem, but it is slightly
>different from what I remember seeing posted here before.  Additionally, my
>NT expertise is not what I would like it to be...... but that's another
>story.
>
>I was asked to help install the ADSM client on an existing NT server that
>already had ARC Serve on it.  I went over to their office, and this is what
>happened.....
>
>1. Installed ADSM client (under the Admin id) went ok - no problems.  We
also
>did a quick backup to insure connectivity.
>
>2.  Installed the REGBACK command, and placed it in the startup folder.
>Again no problems.
>
>3.  Attempted to install the service using DSMCSVCI (this was a V2 client).
>It failed with a return code of 5.   After a minute, the administrator
>decided that the admin id didn't have the correct authority to install a
>service (?), and assigned it to an ARC Serve group that did have this
>authority.  We were then able to install the service.   We started the
>scheduler service, and left it for the night.
>
>4.  The next morning we found that all of the backups had failed with
>authorization failures.
>
>5.  I went back and we looked at the authorization for the admin id.  We
>added the "backup" and "restore" rights to the admin id - then started a
>backup of the C and D drives.  They both appeared to be ok - on the C drive

>we backed up the registry keys, and then began backing up the files.  All
>looked well.
>
>6.  We left it for the overnight run, but it failed again.
>
>It appears that the NT "service" process does not have the authority to do
>backups.  What are we missing - I have not seen this on any other NT
machine
>I have been involved with.
>
>Thanks in advance...
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>                                                     Jerry
>                                                     Jerry
>
>Insanity is doing the same thing over and over..and expecting the results
to
>be different - Anon.
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>