ADSM-L

Re: Server Crash!!

1998-05-27 05:47:21
Subject: Re: Server Crash!!
From: Jason Meaden <jasonm AT AU1.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 05:47:21 -0400
G'day Scott,

You have a corrupt recovery log due to a partial write that was in progress
when the system died.

You should probably restore the DB from your last backup.  Don't bother with a
rollforward, even if you had that enabled.  It will probably roll in the same
error, and the server would still not start.

You could also do a 'dump load audit' but this is very time consuming.

To prevent the problem occuring again, you could mirror the recovery log and
use:

MIRRORWRITE LOG SEQUENTIAL

ADSM will then ensure that one mirror copy has been properly written too before
beginning to write to the next.

Regards,
--
  Mr Jason E Meaden                                  IBM Australia Ltd
  Mr Jason E Meaden                                  IBM Australia Ltd
  Software Service Specialist (Asia Pacific)         55 Coonara Avenue
  IBM Certified Specialist - ADSM             West Pennant Hills  2125
  Phone: 13 24 26 * Fax: 61 2 9354 7797 * Tie: 49427 * VM: RTP(MEADEN)





ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU on 27/05/98 19:18:11
Please respond to ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:
Subject: Server Crash!!


Help,

We have an NT4 SP3 server running ADSM 3.1.0.2 server.

It has been running fine for ages up until last weekend.

The ADSM server crashed with a Dr Watson error relating to DSMSERV.exe.

When we restart the server we get the following message

ANR0990I ADSM server restart-recovery in progress.
ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 500 megabytes.
ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 2004 megabytes.
ANR0306I Recovery log volume mount in progress.
ANR0353I Recovery log analysis pass in progress.
ANR9999D pkthread.c (825) : Run-time assertion failed:  "Cmp64 (
scanLsn, LOGV->headLsn )  != GREATERTHAN" , Thread 0, File logread.c,
Line 364.

Any help would be much appreciated

Regards

Scott




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>