Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm
1998-03-09 17:06:28
ADSMer's,
We have a situation here, in which certain DBA's want data
(non-financial) kept for an absurd length of time (3 years). We've
already told them we won't do backups that long, so they insisted on
archiving. This will consume a lot of resources, and we would like to
develop a charge back system. Has anyone ever set something like this
up with ADSM?? Any comments would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Rick Smith
Maritz, Inc.
Storage & Security Administration
smithrr AT maritz DOT com
(314) 827-1584
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, (continued)
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Richard Sims
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Bill Colwell
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Tim Dobrowolsky
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Steven P Roder
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Mike Wilson
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Smith, Richard
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Tim Dobrowolsky
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, David Hendrix
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm,
David Hendrix [SMTP:dmhendri <=
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Randall Eggert
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Prather, Wanda
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Richard Sims
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Douglas E . Babcock [SMTP:babcock
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Tim Dobrowolsky [SMTP:tim
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, David Hendrix [SMTP:dmhendri
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Prather , Wanda [SMTP:PrathW1
|
|
|