Re: ADSM alternatives
1998-02-12 14:44:12
Subject: |
Re: ADSM alternatives |
From: |
"Kelly J. Lipp" <lipp AT STORSOL DOT COM> |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Feb 1998 12:44:12 -0700 |
Do you think in the long run that an NT based ADSM server solution would still
be too slow for a viable DR solution? What sorts of restore requirements do
you have? Time and data size?
I assume the ArcServer solution has locally attached tapes on each system (or a
traveling tape) that would be used for both the backup and restore in a
disaster.
Kelly
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: ADSM alternatives, (continued)
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Julie Phinney
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Smith, Richard
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Sanders, David
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Wendrock, Richard O
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Craig Shreve
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Jerry Lawson
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Cindy Cannam
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Sanders, David
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Smith, Richard
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: ADSM alternatives,
Kelly J. Lipp <=
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Jim Healy
- Re: ADSM Alternatives, Keenan D Stratton
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Smith, Richard
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Julie Phinney
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Brett Walker
- Re: ADSM alternatives, INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Smith , Richard [SMTP:smithrr
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Julie Phinney [SMTP:jphinney
- Re: ADSM alternatives, Julie Phinney [SMTP:jphinney
|
|
|