Dave,

        We've found Harbor to be some what unreliable.  Several times,
Harbor has brought down the Novell server it was backing up.  Also the
throughput is terrible.

Rick Smith
Maritz, Inc.
Storage & Security Administration
smithrr AT maritz DOT com
(314) 827-1584

> ----------
> From:         Sanders, David[SMTP:DSanders AT INTERNAL.MASSMUTUAL DOT COM]
> Sent:         Wednesday, February 11, 1998 8:43 AM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: ADSM alternatives
>
> Can I ask why (in general terms)??
>
> Also, I wanted to note that there wasn't a great response to my
> question
> about other ADSM replacement product analysis.  Does this mean:
> *there aren't a lot of MVS server customers here on this forum?
> *that people jumped on ADSM initially and for various reasons, don't
> want to convert to another product?
> *that people want to keep quiet about the analysis they may have done?
> *that no other product does the job of ADSM?
>
> I appreciate the responses that I DID get and would appreciate all
> other
> comments?????
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Smith, Richard [SMTP:smithrr AT MARITZ DOT COM]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 1998 9:03 AM
> > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject:      Re: ADSM alternatives
> >
> >         Just a note... We are using Harbor for one of our NT servers
> > and
> > about
> > 10 Novell servers, and plan to replace it with ADSM.
> >
> > Rick Smith
> > Maritz, Inc.
> > Storage & Security Administration
> > smithrr AT maritz DOT com
> > (314) 827-1584
> >
> > > ----------
> > > From:         Hauenstein Peter[SMTP:Peter.Hauenstein AT AID.ZH DOT CH]
> > > Sent:         Wednesday, February 11, 1998 3:17 AM
> > > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > > Subject:      Re: ADSM alternatives
> > >
> > > If you are looking for another solution, have a look at Harbor
> from
> > > Interlink.
> > > web: http:/www.interlink.com
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
>