Here's a YES vote - I think it is worthwhile...
        ----------
        From:   David G. Kalenderian[SMTP:DAVEK AT mitvma.mit DOT edu]
        Sent:   Wednesday, December 03, 1997 7:54 AM
        To:     ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
        Subject:        Re: ADSM requirements

        On Wed, 3 Dec 1997 06:38:05 -0500 Sanders, David said:
        >Jerry, this sounds like a good idea.  Knowledge = leverage!
        >
        >> -----Original Message-----
        >> From: Jerry Lawson [SMTP:jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM]
        >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 1997 7:31 PM
        >> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        >> Subject:      Re: ADSM requirements
        >>
        >> ---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes
        >> ---------------------------
        >> From: INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE
        >> Date: 12/1/97 5:14PM
        >> To: Jerry Lawson at ASUPO
        >> *To: *ADSM-L at SNADGATE
        >> Subject: Re: ADSM requirements
        >>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
        >> ---------
        >> ---------
        >> Hey gang -
        >>
        >> Those who have been around the list for a while remember my
gripe with
        >> requirements and submission of them - I won't repeat them
here.
        >>
        >> But I did have an idea..... What if there was some way to
track what
        >> requests
        >> had been submitted to IBM?  Dave Kalendarian has provided the
number
        >> of the
        >> V3 for VM requirement.... What if we posted the information
about a
        >> request
        >> to the list when we submitted one, so others would have a
chance to
        >> say "Me
        >> too!"!  Or perhaps someone who can develop Internet web pages
(I'm
        >> limited to
        >> Intranet) could build a page of the ones that had been
supplied by
        >> other list
        >> members.....
        >>
        >> I keep thinking there has to be a better way here..... What
do others
        >> think?
        >>
        >> Jerry Lawson
        >> jlawson AT thehartford DOT com

        Jerry,

        I think it's a good idea. We shouldn't limit ourselves to this
one requirement.
        If others think it is worth while, I could create the Web page
for ADSM
        requirements.

        Dave Kalenderian
        M.I.T.