ADSM-L

Re: Proposed compression change?

1997-11-19 15:07:14
Subject: Re: Proposed compression change?
From: Daniel Thompson <thompsod AT USAA DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 14:07:14 -0600
Jerry,

  This is an excellent idea.  I was thinking about compression being a copy
group parm, but any method to select file types to compresss would be
great.

Dan T.

----------
> From: Jerry Lawson <jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM>
> From: Jerry Lawson <jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM>
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Proposed compression change?
> Date: Wednesday, November 19, 1997 10:44 AM
>
> Date:     November 19, 1997             Time: 10:31 AM
> From:     Jerry Lawson
>           The Hartford Insurance Group
> (860)  547-2960          jlawson AT thehartford DOT com
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
> I haven't seen any good requirements discussed on the list lately - is
> I haven't seen any good requirements discussed on the list lately - is
the
> ADSM-R list still working?
>
> At any rate we have a client that is giving us some fits, which as we
> discussed options, this item came to mind....
>
> The problem is that the server supports an Electronic Document Management
> (EDM) system.  The server (which is NT, but I don't think that matters)
has
> about 50 GB of DASD.  A good portion of this data are .TIF files.   These
> files do not compress well; we see lots of messages about "compressed
data
> grew", and retries on the backups as a result.  The net effect is that
for
> large parts of the nightly backup, we wind up retrying most of these
files.
> There are, however, many files on the machine, such as the data base
itself
> (an SQL DB) that compresses very nicely, thank you.
>
> In the current design, compression is a binary decision - it is either on
for
> the whole client, or it is off.  It can be made to be "Client
Determined",
> but this doesn't really change my problem.
>
> What I would like to see is the ability to set compression on by the file
> type.  There are certain types of files (such as TIF, other graphics, and
> sometimes things like DLLs) that just don't compress, and we just wind up
> tripping over them.  These in turn slow down the whole backup process for
the
> retry.  By being able to set an "exclude from compression"  indicator,
the
> client would skip the files matching the pattern.
>
> Any other opinions?
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
>                                                      Jerry
>                                                      Jerry
>
> Insanity is doing the same thing over and over..and expecting the results
to
> be different - Anon.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>