ADSM-L

Re: ADSM Thruput?

1997-08-20 10:18:54
Subject: Re: ADSM Thruput?
From: "Larimer, Dave" <Dave_Larimer AT KNE DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 08:18:54 -0600
To Tony Field,

        We have had ADSM for over two years at our shop and are very satisfied
with its performance.  We run a IBM VM shop backing up a network
totalling over 500 gb.  Our backups take approximately 9 hours to
complete with a fair amount of free time inbetween.   We are currently
in the process of converting to an MVS system and anticipate no problems
under the new operating system.  If you wish more information on how our
shop is set up email me at Dave_Larimer AT kne DOT com, I will be happy to give
you more details.

Dave Larimer
KNEnergy, Inc.


>----------
>From:  Anthony Field[SMTP:field AT CANBERRA.STARWAY.NET DOT AU]
>Sent:  Wednesday, August 20, 1997 9:08 PM
>To:    ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>Subject:       ADSM Thruput?
>
>Hi,
>
>We are currently evaluating ADSM using MVS as the server and would like to
>backup Netware (100Gb), Notes on NT (50gb) & SAP/R3 on SUN (200Gb). We are
>particularly concerned about thruput with TCP/IP on MVS. Assuming the above
>servers will be connected to our CMOS boxes via OSA using FDDI or ATM. What
>sort of thruput can we reasonably expect using TCP/IP on the mainframe.
>Should we even bother with this approach (ie MVS) or would it be better to
>run the ADSM server on a sun box and SCSI connect drives into our existing
>silos etc.
>
>Any ideas/thoughts or experiences would be extremely helpful.
>
>thanks
>
>Tony
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>