Iseli,Dominique,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF wrote:
>
> We use mvs server on a 120 mips machine with a 3494 1800 cartridges and
> we backup over             3172 ATM Lan connected  and we have a thougput
> elapsed all included of 2,8 giga/hour/session and we have about 10
> parallel sessions  (We could have more)  so we have
> 20 giga's / hour but we could do better of course. We backup Oracle ,
> SAP/R3 , Nt 4 , HPUX, Novell Os2 and more .
>
> We tried an Nt bi pro200Mhz with high speed disks as a adsm server but
> after 10 minutes the machine was down.
> MVS with a lot a chanels and cpu is very nice for us.
>
> Iseli Dominique
> Operating Systems & Networks
> NESTEC SA - Vevey Switzerland
> Tel ++41 21 924.26.91 / Fax 924.28.88
>  Internet Dominique.Iseli AT nestle DOT com
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From:  Anthony Field [SMTP:field AT CANBERRA.STARWAY.NET DOT AU]
> >Sent:  Thursday, August 21, 1997 5:09 AM
> >To:    ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> >Subject:       ADSM Thruput?
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >We are currently evaluating ADSM using MVS as the server and would like to
> >backup Netware (100Gb), Notes on NT (50gb) & SAP/R3 on SUN (200Gb). We are
> >particularly concerned about thruput with TCP/IP on MVS. Assuming the above
> >servers will be connected to our CMOS boxes via OSA using FDDI or ATM. What
> >sort of thruput can we reasonably expect using TCP/IP on the mainframe.
> >Should we even bother with this approach (ie MVS) or would it be better to
> >run the ADSM server on a sun box and SCSI connect drives into our existing
> >silos etc.
> >
> >Any ideas/thoughts or experiences would be extremely helpful.
> >
> >thanks
> >
> >Tony


we have adsm on mvs server and back up several os/2 and some nt nodes
and see 300-450 m/hr throughput.

that's with a 3745 channel using tcp/ip.


i don't know how this compares to other shops, but would be curious to
hear other experiences.


steve