ADSM-L

RAW versus JFS (ADSM DB and LOG)

1997-06-26 12:14:37
Subject: RAW versus JFS (ADSM DB and LOG)
From: Udo Wanders <UDO.WANDERS.UW AT BAYER-AG DOT DE>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 17:14:37 +0100
Hi there,

we have defined RAW devices for the ADSM/6000 DB and LOG.
With SMON we found out that our 8 way RS/6000 was
in state Wait I/O for nearly 750 %. The only activity
we see, is the I/O activity on the DB and LOG disks.
This happens, when we execute Expirery, Copy Tapepool,
migrations, ...
Perhaps its much more better with DB and LOGS on JFS filesystems.

Udo Wanders
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RAW versus JFS (ADSM DB and LOG), Udo Wanders <=