Re: (Fwd) ADSM data security
2015-10-04 18:07:24
My response to these questions, and we do get them, is to =
say, "If you
are worried about privacy of data, encrypt the files on =
your machine."
Doing so won't affect ADSM performance, as a strategy that =
encrypted
during the backup process would.
I think people are trained to ask this question but don't =
much follow
thru on locking the door on the room that contains the =
machine, and
other more basic measures.
erl
I'm sorry - that's a bit of a copout. There are many environments where
it's relatively easy to snoop on a network, but individual machines are
access-controlled. Here, for example, we run encrypted telnet or ssh
between sessions on machines so casual sniffing can't read the traffic =
as
it happens, but if ADSM doesn't encrypt, then we're exposed during the
backup cycle anyway.
Also, for our uses, it makes much more sense to take a hit on the backup =
end
rather than everytime the file is accessed by a user process.
Pat Wilson
paw AT dartmouth DOT edu
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- (Fwd) ADSM data security, Kent L. Johnson
- Re: (Fwd) ADSM data security, Dwight E. Cook
- Re: (Fwd) ADSM data security, Eric LEWIS
- Re: (Fwd) ADSM data security, Richard Sims
- Re: (Fwd) ADSM data security, Pittson, Timothy ,HiServ/NA
- Re: (Fwd) ADSM data security, Pat Wilson
- Re: (Fwd) ADSM data security, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: (Fwd) ADSM data security, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: (Fwd) ADSM data security, Pat Wilson
- Re: (Fwd) ADSM data security, Dwight E . Cook [SMTP:decook
- Re: (Fwd) ADSM data security,
Pat Wilson [SMTP:paw <=
|
|
|