ADSM-L

Re: DR Question for Copy Pools

2015-10-04 18:08:06
Subject: Re: DR Question for Copy Pools
From: INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE
To: Jerry Lawson at ASUPO
Date: 5/7/97 10:06AM
Something we did that helped some -

We backed up the DASD pool first, and then ran only backups of the DASD pool
for a couple of weeks.  Then we started the backup of the tape pool as Ron
suggests.  The DASD pool backups are faster, obviously because there are only
output tape mounts; and by running the two weeks of DASD only backups first,
we eventually cut down on the amount of tape data that needed to be backed
up.

Jerry Lawson
jlawson AT thehartford DOT com


______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: Re: DR Question for Copy Pools
Author:  INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE
Date:    5/7/97 10:06 AM


Fred,
You are on the right track.  After the first big copy, the nightly
copies will be easy.  I fire off a backup copypool about 4 am each
morning to get the copy pools up to date from the night's backups.  Bear
in mind that for the first big copy of 300GB you can start and stop the
backup copypool many times, and, if you are limited on tape drives, you
will have to.  You will pay a time penalty, though, each time ADSM has
to figure out where he left off (on the order of about 30 min to an
hour).
Good luck, its fun to watch it grow. Ya I know, I'm sick and twisted.
Not as bad as that Dwight Cook, though...

Ron Clendenny  <rdclendenny AT cal.ue DOT com>
Callaway Nuclear Power Plant
Fulton, Missouri

"You can't have everything.  Where would you put it?" - Steven Wright

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Urso [SMTP:furso AT ISM DOT CA]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 1997 4:51 PM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      DR Question for Copy Pools
>
> I am in the process of developing a disaster offsite plan for our
> current ADSM environment.
>
> Now since ADSM has been running for about 6-8 months now and there is
> about 300GB of data in
> the TAPE Storage Pool and about 35GB in the primary Disk Storage Pool.
>
> If i wanted to create offsite tapes does this mean that I would have
> to copy all 300GB and 35GB to
> tapes within the COPY Storage Pool, and then I could do incrementals
> COPY'S from here on in.
>
> Am I on the right track here...Because copying 300GB would take a
> while. But is the only
 > way to get the offsite tapes up-to-date.
>
> Thanks
>
> furso AT ism DOT ca
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>